better (correct?) way to handle `next' over removed keys

This commit is contained in:
Roberto Ierusalimschy
2004-12-04 16:10:22 -02:00
parent 61a888518f
commit 531874f6ce
2 changed files with 18 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
** $Id: lobject.h,v 2.6 2004/10/06 18:34:16 roberto Exp $
** $Id: lobject.h,v 2.7 2004/11/01 15:06:50 roberto Exp roberto $
** Type definitions for Lua objects
** See Copyright Notice in lua.h
*/
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
*/
#define LUA_TPROTO (NUM_TAGS+1)
#define LUA_TUPVAL (NUM_TAGS+2)
#define LUA_TDEADKEY (NUM_TAGS+3)
/*