better (correct?) way to handle `next' over removed keys
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** $Id: lobject.h,v 2.6 2004/10/06 18:34:16 roberto Exp $
|
||||
** $Id: lobject.h,v 2.7 2004/11/01 15:06:50 roberto Exp roberto $
|
||||
** Type definitions for Lua objects
|
||||
** See Copyright Notice in lua.h
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define LUA_TPROTO (NUM_TAGS+1)
|
||||
#define LUA_TUPVAL (NUM_TAGS+2)
|
||||
#define LUA_TDEADKEY (NUM_TAGS+3)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user