More uniformity in code generation for 'for' loops
Added new instruction 'OP_TFORPREP' to prepare a generic for loop. Currently it is equivalent to a jump (but with a format 'iABx', similar to other for-loop preparing instructions), but soon it will be the place to create upvalues for closing loop states.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ OP_FORLOOP,/* A Bx R(A)+=R(A+2);
|
||||
if R(A) <?= R(A+1) then { pc-=Bx; R(A+3)=R(A) } */
|
||||
OP_FORPREP,/* A Bx R(A)-=R(A+2); pc+=Bx */
|
||||
|
||||
OP_TFORPREP,/* A Bx create upvalue A; pc+=Bx */
|
||||
OP_TFORCALL,/* A C R(A+3), ... ,R(A+2+C) := R(A)(R(A+1), R(A+2)); */
|
||||
OP_TFORLOOP,/* A Bx if R(A+1) ~= nil then { R(A)=R(A+1); pc -= Bx } */
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user