nik/lush
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Bug: check for constructor overflow in [exp] fields

Browse Source 
The check for constructor overflow was considering only fields with
explicit names, ignoring fields with syntax '[exp]=exp'.
This commit is contained in:
Roberto Ierusalimschy
2025-05-20 17:50:56 -03:00
parent be05c44481
commit c15543b9af
2 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
lopcodes.h
View File

@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ OP_SETTABLE,/* A B C R[A][R[B]] := RK(C) */
OP_SETI,/* A B C R[A][B] := RK(C) */
OP_SETFIELD,/* A B C R[A][K[B]:shortstring] := RK(C) */
OP_NEWTABLE,/* A B C k R[A] := {} */
OP_NEWTABLE,/* A vB vC k R[A] := {} */
OP_SELF,/* A B C R[A+1] := R[B]; R[A] := R[B][K[C]:shortstring] */
@@ -378,9 +378,9 @@ OP_EXTRAARG/* Ax extra (larger) argument for previous opcode */
real C = EXTRAARG _ C (the bits of EXTRAARG concatenated with the
bits of C).
(*) In OP_NEWTABLE, B is log2 of the hash size (which is always a
(*) In OP_NEWTABLE, vB is log2 of the hash size (which is always a
power of 2) plus 1, or zero for size zero. If not k, the array size
is C. Otherwise, the array size is EXTRAARG _ C.
is vC. Otherwise, the array size is EXTRAARG _ vC.
(*) For comparisons, k specifies what condition the test should accept
(true or false).